RIGGED: ‘Low bar’ used to convict Trump-supporting Proud Boys of ‘seditious conspiracy’ in connection with Jan. 6 riot explained

In case you missed it, last week, the deep state’s ‘sedition’ narrative as it pertained to the false flag attack against the U.S. Capitol Building on Jan. 6, 2021, finally came true, thanks to a very “low bar” set by federal prosecutors and accepted by a Trump-hating grand jury in Washington, D.C.

The sham trial and conviction were explained in detail by American Greatness correspondent Julie Kelly in a lengthy Twitter thread that included screenshots of court documents. What’s more, she also pointed out that constitutionally protected political speech under the First Amendment has now been permanently impacted.

“I want to walk through jury instructions on seditious conspiracy to demonstrate the vagueness of the charge and how easy it is to prove. Just look at (2)–this could apply to essentially any political protest on the federal level,” her thread began.

I want to walk through jury instructions on seditious conspiracy to demonstrate the vagueness of the charge and how easy it is to prove.

Just look at (2)–this could apply to essentially any political protest on the federal level. pic.twitter.com/c7ufmGc4GX

— Julie Kelly ?? (@julie_kelly2) May 5, 2023

“So agreeing to a ‘conspiracy’ (I’ll get to that laughable definition in a moment) to interfere in the execution of federal law is ‘seditious’ but oh btw it’s not necessary for DOJ to prove that the accused knew which law they conspired to break,” she continued, adding a thinking emoji.

So agreeing to a “conspiracy” (I’ll get to that laughable definition in a moment) to interfere in the execution of federal law is “seditious” but oh btw it’s not necessary for DOJ to prove that the accused knew which law they conspired to break? pic.twitter.com/9f5ITkdf3r

— Julie Kelly ?? (@julie_kelly2) May 5, 2023

“There are not enough LOLs in the world for this. One prosecutor told Proud Boys jury that a ‘wink and a nod’ constitutes agreement to a conspiracy. Now do you see the low bar to indict Trump?” she continued.

“But it says ‘by force!’ Here’s DOJs burden of proof. Basically none. Further, what ‘force’ was used when no one brought a weapon, no one assaulted police, and some (Nordean) walked through an open door WITH POLICE RIGHT THERE. Further, Enrique Tarrio was in Baltimore on Jan 6,” Kelly noted further.

“Consider how this would apply to nearly every protest in Washington, especially climate demonstrations and Kavanaugh confirmation process. This is conspiracy to obstruct Congress,” she added.

Consider how this would apply to nearly every protest in Washington, especially climate demonstrations and Kavanaugh confirmation process.

This is conspiracy to obstruct Congress. pic.twitter.com/WXn3oyzvay

— Julie Kelly ?? (@julie_kelly2) May 5, 2023

But again, beyond this disgusting legal charade that was just employed to convict Trump supporters of a phony ‘sedition’ charge, the entire Jan. 6 riot was part of a deep state false flag to begin with, as a professional observer noted on the day of the incident.

J. Michael Waller, who was at the Capitol that day, wrote about what he saw in a piece for The Federalist a week after the breach:

• Plainclothes militants. Militant, aggressive men in Donald Trump and MAGA gear at a front police line at the base of the temporary presidential inaugural platform;
• Agents-provocateurs. Scattered groups of men exhorting the marchers to gather closely and tightly toward the center of the outside of the Capitol building and prevent them from leaving;
• Fake Trump protesters. A few young men wearing Trump or MAGA hats backwards and who did not fit in with the rest of the crowd in terms of their actions and demeanor, whom I presumed to be Antifa or other leftist agitators; and
• Disciplined, uniformed column of attackers. A column of organized, disciplined men, wearing similar but not identical camouflage uniforms and black gear, some with helmets and GoPro cameras or wearing subdued Punisher skull patches.

In reality, Democrats pose the greatest risk to our democracy simply by the matter of the Marxist/Socialist policies they pursue and implement, and the division they sow. And in fact, to that point, the committee’s chairman, Rep. Bennie Thompson (D-Miss.), opened the hearing with a ridiculous reference to the Ku Klux Klan and lynchings — two phenomena directly linked historically to his party.

Sources include:

NaturalNews.com

ThreadReaderApp.com